AutismInsights
Back to research database
EmergingMeta-Analysis

Psychological behavioral therapies to improve autistic children's behaviors during dental visits: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice2024

Pui Ying Lam Phoebe, Hoi Wan Fok Elise, Tung Megan Chan Yuen, Ming Leung Chung, McGrath Colman Patrick, Kar Yung Yiu Cynthia

What this study means for families

Researchers looked at 18 studies to see if special behavioral techniques help autistic children behave better at the dentist. They found that about half of children could cooperate with dental exams on their first visit, with slightly more cooperating on their second visit. However, most techniques like visual aids, communication systems, and behavioral programs didn't show clear benefits. The studies were too small and poorly designed to give us strong answers about what really works.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Research summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 18 studies investigating psychological behavioral therapies to improve dental visit behaviors in autistic children. Results showed 56% of children could cooperate with dental examinations using an oral mirror on their first visit, increasing to 64% on the second visit. However, visual pedagogies and teaching aids showed no significant improvement in acceptance rates. Other interventions including TEACCH, PECS, Applied Behavior Analysis, video modeling, and distractions produced inconsistent results.

The studies had significant methodological limitations including small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and failure to account for autism severity, comorbidities, or previous dental experiences, limiting the strength of evidence.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Key findings

  • 1

    56% of autistic children cooperated with dental examination using oral mirror on first visit, increasing to 64% on second visit

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Suggests gradual improvement with repeated exposure, though improvement is modest
  • 2

    Visual pedagogies and teaching aids did not significantly improve dental exam acceptance rates

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Commonly used visual supports may not be as effective as assumed for dental visits
  • 3

    TEACCH, PECS, ABA, video modeling, and distractions showed inconsistent results

    Confidence: lowRelevance: Evidence insufficient to recommend specific behavioral interventions for dental visits

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Clinical implications

Current evidence provides insufficient guidance for selecting effective behavioral interventions for dental visits in autistic children. Clinicians should consider individual factors like autism severity and previous experiences. Repeated exposure may provide modest benefits, but more rigorous research is needed to identify evidence-based approaches.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Limitations

Studies had small sample sizes, lacked control groups, and failed to account for autism severity, comorbidities, or previous dental experiences. These methodological limitations significantly weaken the reliability and generalizability of findings.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Original abstract

This research review looked at how well different psychological behavioral therapies help improve the behavior of autistic children during dental visits. The researchers studied 18 different studies and found that, on average, about 56% of autistic children were able to cooperate with a dental exam using an oral mirror during their first visit. The number increased to about 64% during their second visit. However, using visual pedagogies or teaching aids did not seem to make a big difference in how many children could accept the dental exams.

The results for other psychological behavioral techniques were also inconsistent, including Treatment and Education of Autistic and related Communication-handicapped CHildren, Picture Exchange Communication System, Applied Behavior Analysis, video modeling, and distractions. Many of the studies were small and did not include a comparison group. They also did not consider factors like how severe the autism was, other conditions the children had, or their previous dental experiences. Because of these limitations, the evidence supporting the use of psychological behavioral techniques to improve dental visits for autistic children is limited and uncertain.

More research with larger studies and proper control groups is needed to better understand this topic.

View Original Paper

View original paperFull paper via publisher (may require subscription)

Evidence Grade

Emerging

limited

Grade assigned by AutismInsights based on study type and published abstract.

Study Details

Type
Meta-Analysis
Journal
Autism : the international journal of research and practice
Year
2024
PMID
38859552
DOI
10.1177/13623613241255302

MeSH Terms

ChildHumansAutistic DisorderBehavior TherapyChild BehaviorDental Care for Children